Most people spend years building skills that could generate real income, but they never figure out what someone would actually pay them for. You might be capable, credible, and experienced, yet still uncertain about what you could offer that people would pull out their wallets for. The gap between what you know how to do and what creates a paying customer comes down to understanding what people value enough to exchange money for, then testing that assumption in the smallest, safest way possible.
I’ve watched talented people stay stuck not because they lack ability, but because they never ask the right questions about willingness to pay. They assume, they hope, they build elaborate plans, but they don’t verify. The anxiety isn’t about whether you’re good enough. It’s about whether you’re solving a problem someone actually recognizes and prioritizes right now.
This isn’t about quitting anything or chasing some fantasy. It’s about learning to see your own capabilities through the lens of what creates a transaction. You don’t need perfect certainty before you start, but you do need a framework for testing what matters.
Key Takeaways
- Focus on understanding what specific problems people recognize and prioritize enough to pay for right now
- Test willingness to pay with small, low-risk experiments before building anything elaborate
- Refine your offer continuously based on real customer feedback rather than assumptions
Understanding What People Value and Are Willing to Pay For
The gap between what you think matters and what someone will actually open their wallet for is where most income ideas die. Willingness to pay is measurable, predictable, and entirely separate from how hard you worked or how clever your idea seems.
Willingness to Pay Explained
Willingness to pay is the maximum amount someone will spend to solve a specific problem or gain a specific outcome. It’s not about what they say they value in a survey or what sounds nice in theory.
I’ve watched colleagues spend months building services based on what people claimed to want, only to find zero buyers when it came time to charge. The difference between stated preference and actual behavior is enormous. People will tell you they care about sustainability, convenience, or quality, but their credit card statements reveal what they actually prioritize.
Your monetary valuation is revealed through action, not intention. A parent might say they value work-life balance, but if they’re paying for meal delivery, housecleaning, and premium childcare, those are the problems they’re solving with money right now. That’s where willingness to pay lives.
Demographics, urgency, and existing budget allocation all affect this number. Someone earning $200K with two kids under five has different willingness to pay than someone earning $80K with teenagers. The same solution commands different prices depending on who needs it and when.
Distinguishing Between Wants and Needs
Needs generate higher willingness to pay because the cost of inaction is immediate and painful. Wants are aspirational and easily deferred when budgets tighten.
A tax attorney who helps you avoid an audit is addressing a need. A productivity course that promises to make you “10x more effective” is addressing a want. One gets paid premium rates with little price resistance. The other faces constant comparison shopping and abandoned checkouts.
I think about this through the lens of what happens if someone does nothing. If the consequence of inaction is a missed opportunity for improvement, you’re selling a want. If the consequence is loss, liability, or continued pain, you’re selling a need.
Most people with corporate jobs and family obligations have limited discretionary income and even less discretionary time. They will pay generously to eliminate problems but hesitate on enhancements. You’re not trying to convince someone to care about something new—you’re identifying what already keeps them up at night.
Defining a Compelling Value Proposition
Your value proposition is the specific, measurable outcome you deliver relative to what someone pays. It answers one question: what do I get for my money?
“I help busy professionals organize their finances” is not a value proposition. “I reduce your tax liability by an average of $8,000 through restructuring” is. One describes an activity; the other describes a result worth paying for.
The strongest value propositions connect directly to existing pain or desire. You’re not creating demand, you’re capturing it. When I see someone successfully charging for their expertise, they can always articulate the before state, the after state, and why that transformation matters in concrete terms.
Price becomes less relevant when the value proposition is clear and urgent. A $2,000 service that saves someone $10,000 or prevents a $50,000 mistake is easy to justify. A $200 service that offers vague improvement is hard to sell even when objectively affordable.
Your job is to understand what outcome someone is already trying to buy, then position what you offer as the clearest path to that outcome.
Identifying Monetizable Skills, Products, or Services
The difference between what you’re capable of and what someone will pay for isn’t always obvious. What feels routine to you often represents real value to someone else facing a problem you’ve already solved.
Conducting a Skill and Offer Audit
I start by writing down everything I do in a typical work week that produces a result. Not job titles or responsibilities, but actual tasks that create outcomes.
This includes the spreadsheet model I built to forecast revenue or pipeline needs. The way I restructured my outreach cadence to recover six hours a week. The presentation framework I use when I need executive sign-off. These aren’t impressive on their own, but each one solved a specific problem.
The audit works best when I separate what I did from what it accomplished. “Managed customer relationships” is vague. “Renegotiated SaaS contracts and increased yearly ARR by 35%” points to measurable value. That distinction matters because people pay for outcomes, not effort.
I also look at tasks others ask me to help with repeatedly. When three colleagues request the same kind of input, that pattern signals something worth examining.
Narrowing Down to Specific and Marketable Solutions
Once I have a list, I need to identify which skills address customer needs that are urgent, expensive, or both. Not every capability has a market.
I ask: who loses money or time when this problem goes unsolved? A hiring manager who can’t write job descriptions that attract qualified candidates wastes weeks on bad fits. A mid-level manager struggling with difficult performance conversations risks team turnover. Both have budget and motivation.
The value proposition becomes clear when I can name the before and after. Before: spending $12K on recruiters for roles that stay open 90 days. After: writing clearer job posts that cut time-to-hire in half. That’s not a skill—that’s a solution.
I’m looking for problems where someone has already tried to fix it themselves and failed, or where the cost of inaction is climbing. Those create urgency.
Applying Market Validation Techniques
Validation means testing whether anyone actually wants what I think I can offer, before I build anything elaborate.
I mention the skill in conversation with people in my network who face the problem. I’m not selling—I’m asking if this is something they’ve struggled with and what they’ve tried. If I hear “I’ve been meaning to figure that out” more than once, I have signal.
I can also offer the solution once, for free or cheap, to someone I trust to give honest feedback. Did it save them time? Would they have paid for it? What would have made it more useful? Their answers tell me whether I’m solving a real problem or an imaginary one.
Another approach: I search LinkedIn, Reddit, or industry forums for people asking questions related to the skill. If the same question appears across multiple threads with no good answers, that gap represents opportunity. The goal isn’t proof of a massive market—it’s evidence that the problem exists and people are actively looking for help.
Researching and Engaging With Potential Customers
The gap between what you think someone will pay for and what they actually open their wallet for closes through direct conversation and observation. Customer interviews reveal the language people use to describe their problems, feedback shows you where your assumptions break, and behavioral data tells you what people do when no one is watching.
Customer Interviews
I schedule 20-minute conversations with people who fit the profile of someone I want to serve. I’m not selling anything in these calls. I’m listening for the exact words they use when they describe what frustrates them.
The question I return to most often is: “What have you already tried to solve this?” That answer tells me how urgent the problem feels and whether they’ve spent money on it before. If someone has paid three different people to help them organize their home office and still feels stuck, I know the need is real.
I also ask what happened the last time they considered hiring someone like me. Did they get quotes? Did they start and stop? The specifics of their past behavior matter more than their stated intentions. When someone says “I’d definitely pay for that,” I follow up with, “When was the last time you paid for something similar?”
Most people will tell you the truth if you ask clearly and don’t lead them toward the answer you want to hear.
Analyzing Customer Feedback
I look at customer feedback not to confirm what I already believe, but to find the pattern I missed. Written reviews, survey responses, and offhand comments in email threads often contain the same three or four complaints phrased in slightly different ways.
When I see the same frustration mentioned repeatedly, I know that’s a problem worth solving that people might pay to avoid. One client kept hearing “I never know what I’m supposed to do next” from customers who bought her templates. That phrase became the foundation for a paid onboarding service.
I pay special attention to feedback that includes the words “I wish” or “I thought this would.” Those sentences reveal the gap between expectation and reality. That gap is often where paid solutions live.
Using Behavioral Data
What people do with their time and money tells a more honest story than what they say in conversation. I track which emails get opened, which pages on my site get the most visits, and where people stop in a purchasing process.
If 200 people visit a sales page and no one buys, the problem isn’t traffic. It’s the offer, the price, or the clarity of what I’m actually selling. If people download a free resource but never engage again, I’m solving a problem that isn’t painful enough to pay for.
I also watch where people spend money adjacent to what I offer. If someone pays $500 for a course on productivity but won’t pay $100 for a template library, the format might matter more than the topic. Behavioral data doesn’t explain why someone makes a choice, but it shows you what they choose when it counts.
Testing and Measuring Willingness to Pay
You can’t rely on intuition alone when pricing matters this much. The gap between what you think someone will pay and what they actually will pay can be the difference between a working business model and one that quietly fails before it starts.
Price Points and Sensitivity Assessments
Price sensitivity tells you how demand shifts when you adjust what you charge. Some offerings lose buyers immediately when prices increase. Others remain attractive across a surprisingly wide range.
The most direct approach involves showing different prices to different segments and tracking their responses. You present a product at $50 to one group, $75 to another, and $100 to a third. Their purchase behavior tells you what surveys often obscure.
Gabor-Granger testing works by asking potential buyers if they would purchase at a specific price, then systematically raising or lowering that number based on their answer. You start at one price point and move in one direction until you find where interest drops off. This method produces clean data about purchase probability at each level.
The weakness is that hypothetical questions generate hypothetical answers. People say yes to prices they wouldn’t actually pay when their wallet isn’t open in front of them.
The Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter
This framework asks four questions about a single product. At what price would it seem too expensive to consider? At what price would it feel expensive but still worth considering? At what price would it feel like a bargain? At what price would it seem too cheap to trust?
You plot the responses on a graph where the lines intersect. Those intersections show you the acceptable price range and the point of indifference where equal numbers of people find it expensive and inexpensive.
| Question | What It Reveals |
|---|---|
| Too expensive | Upper boundary of the market |
| Expensive but acceptable | Realistic ceiling for most buyers |
| Good value | Lower boundary before quality concerns |
| Too cheap | Point where trust breaks down |
Van Westendorp works best when you’re pricing something that has clear comparables in the market. It struggles with novel offerings because people lack reference points. The method also assumes price is the primary variable, which isn’t always true when you’re selling expertise or transformation.
Probability and Direct Questions
Some researchers prefer asking what someone would actually pay rather than testing specific numbers. You present the offer and ask them to name their maximum price. This captures their internal ceiling without anchoring them to your suggestions.
The risk is that people lowball their own answers or simply don’t know. Willingness to pay isn’t always conscious or stable. It shifts based on context, framing, and how recently they felt the problem you’re solving.
I’ve found that combining direct questions with behavioral observation gives you the clearest picture. Ask what they’d pay, but also watch what they do when given the chance to buy. The difference between stated and revealed preference tells you whether your research reflects reality or just reflects what people think they should say.
Structuring and Experimenting With Pricing
Testing what people actually pay requires creating clear options and measuring what happens when you change the numbers. You need to see which price points generate the most revenue and which structures make people comfortable enough to commit.
Setting Up Tiered Pricing Models
Tiered pricing shows people three or four options at different price points, each with different features or levels of access. The lowest tier gets someone in the door. The middle tier typically converts best because it feels neither too cautious nor too ambitious. The highest tier exists partly to make the middle option look reasonable.
I structure tiers by asking what someone would pay to solve their problem at minimum viable level, what they’d pay for a better experience, and what they’d pay for the premium version. Each tier needs a clear reason to exist beyond just price differences.
The mistake most people make is putting too many features in the lowest tier or making the jump between tiers feel arbitrary. If your mid-tier is $97 and your top tier is $297, the person paying three times more should receive something they can immediately understand as worth three times more. Your conversion rate depends on this clarity more than the actual numbers.
Start with three tiers if you’re unsure. You can always add a fourth later once you see where people cluster.
A/B Testing Pricing Strategies
A/B testing means showing half your audience one price and half another price, then comparing conversion rates to see which generates more revenue. You’re not guessing anymore. You’re watching what people do when the only variable is the number on the screen.
I recommend testing one change at a time. If you test both price and messaging together, you won’t know which one moved the needle. Test a $197 offer against a $247 offer with everything else identical. Run the test until at least 100 people have seen each version, more if your traffic is inconsistent.
The goal isn’t finding the price with the highest conversion rate. It’s finding the price with the highest total revenue. Sometimes a lower price converts at 8% while a higher price converts at 5%, but the higher price still generates more money per hundred visitors.
Track both metrics in a simple table:
| Price Point | Conversion Rate | Revenue per 100 Visitors |
|---|---|---|
| $197 | 8% | $1,576 |
| $247 | 5% | $1,235 |
You’re looking for the intersection of acceptable volume and maximum revenue.
Analyzing Conversion Rates
Conversion rate tells you what percentage of people who see your offer actually buy it. If 100 people see your pricing page and 4 people buy, your conversion rate is 4%. This number matters because it reveals whether your pricing matches what people expected and whether they believe the value justifies the cost.
A conversion rate below 2% usually means something is misaligned. Either the price is higher than the perceived value, the offer isn’t clear, or the wrong people are seeing it. A rate above 10% might mean you’re leaving money on the table by pricing too low.
I watch conversion rates across different traffic sources separately. People from a referral convert differently than people from a cold ad. People who’ve been on your email list for three months convert differently than people who just found you yesterday.
The pattern matters more than any single number. If your conversion rate drops when you raise prices but your revenue per visitor increases, you’ve found useful information. If your rate stays flat across a range of prices, you know demand is relatively inelastic in that range and you should test higher.
Refining Offers Based on Continuous Learning
Your first offer is never your final offer. The people willing to pay you will tell you what they actually value if you stay close enough to hear it, and their willingness to pay shifts as their circumstances change.
Iterating Offers With Ongoing Customer Feedback
I talk to my clients after every transaction, not because I’m being polite, but because I need to know what part of the offer mattered most. Was it the speed? The format? The outcome they could point to in a meeting?
Customer feedback shows you where you guessed right and where you missed. Someone might pay you for a service but later admit they would have paid more for a different version of it. Another might say the price was fine but the packaging confused them. These aren’t complaints. They’re instructions.
I don’t send surveys. I ask directly: What would have made this worth more to you? The answers are rarely what I expect. One client told me the template I included was more valuable than the consultation itself. I now sell the template separately at a higher margin.
You’re not fishing for praise. You’re looking for the gap between what you offered and what they were trying to solve. That gap is where your next iteration lives.
Monitoring Price Sensitivity Over Time
Price sensitivity isn’t static. What someone pays you in March may not reflect what they’d pay in October, not because your work changed, but because their budget, urgency, or priorities did.
I watch for patterns in hesitation. If three people in a row pause at the same price point, I test a lower entry offer or reframe the value. If no one blinks at a number I thought was high, I raise it for the next five conversations. This isn’t manipulation. It’s alignment.
The goal is to stay current with what people can afford and what they consider urgent. A working parent with two daycare bills has different price sensitivity in January than in June. I adjust without apology, because my offers need to match the reality of who’s across from me, not some ideal version of the market I imagined six months ago.
Want to Start Creating Your Own Parallel Income Stream?
Check out The More Money and Time™ Lab
